How often have you come across a new – to you, the reader, that is! – term in a botanical text and wondered what it meant? Well, OK, maybe not that often, but when you do, how frequently have you then looked up that term to be confronted with a word-only description and longed for a more helpful illustrated one? Well, if that’s the case, then with Henk Beentje’s The Kew Plant Glossary (published in 2010 by Kew Publishing, £18.00 in paperback; hereafter referred to as KPG) you need worry no more (or, at any rate, worry a little less…).
Although entitled ‘plant glossary’, it is not a fully comprehensive and exhaustive listing of all terms from the complete range of botanical knowledge. Rather, KPG culls its terms from those used by botanists to “describe plants in textbooks, scientific papers, floras and field guides” [back cover]. Nevertheless, it contains 4100 such terms [no, I haven’t counted them - here I have relied on the book’s own declaration] ranging from ‘a-’ to ‘zygomorphous’, and >730 of them (from ‘abaxial’ to ‘zygomorphy’) are illustrated. (no, I didn’t count them either – Christmas holidays can be a little tiresome, but not so boring that I resort to counting pictures…or dictionary terms…). All letters of the English alphabet are represented, except Y [for completeness KPG could have listed ‘yarda’ - a peaty bog -http://www.succulent-plant.com/glossary/plantglossaryy.html]. KPG also includes 18 plates illustrating ’grouped terms’, which are themselves defined – and often illustrated – elsewhere in the book. Although this may seem like ’double-counting’ or redundant repetition, grouping such terms together is useful for comparing such features as venation of leaves, inflorescence types, and surface indumenta. KPG is not exclusively restricted to seed plants – it has a separate plate for specialised fern terms (though does strangely consider ’sporophyte’ to be a term that only applies to pteridophytes – p. 111). And – lest there be any lingering doubt – the terms covered are those used in English plant descriptions (but which are themselves borrowed from numerous sources – not just Latin: Although you could be forgiven for thinking they were judging by the long list of Latin abbreviations on pp. 3-4!). KPG helpfully indicates preferred terms (where what pass for synonyms in the English language exist) and those which are of uncommon usage (but which may still be encountered…hence their inclusion). Although laudable, that latter strategy may ultimately be self-defeating since the mere act of repeating those defunct terms only serves to acknowledge their existence and prolong their life.
Sub-titled an illustrated dictionary of plant terms, KPG is certainly illustrated. But, and disappointingly, the beautiful full colour images on the front and back covers are neither reproduced within nor matched by the other illustrations inside the book, which are black line drawings on a green (’pale citrine’ – p. 159 – to my eyes) background. Proof again – if such were still needed – of the old adage that you shouldn’t judge a book by its cover. But it would have been nice to have a few illustrations in colour, and ideally photographs, showing real structures as they appear in life. Nevertheless, the included llustrations do their job – and probably in the way that only drawings can in, i.e. not only illustrating, but also exaggerating, the relevant feature(s). Still, KPG is not entirely monochrome because it contains a colour chart on pp. 159-160. This is an extremely useful inclusion because colour words are used in some of the glossary’s terms, and can be checked against the colour chart to aid comprehension.
Accepting that there are limits to the words that are included, how well does KPG work for those that are there? Take for example the entry for ’catkin’ on p. 25, which is described as “a slender, often pendulous, cylindrical racemose or spicate inflorescence with crowded (sub)sessile unisexual apetalous flowers, falling as a whole after fruiting; = ament(um)”.
Taken at face value, that definition may be difficult to understand – particularly if you are new to the world of the botancial glossary and/or English is not your first language – because it contains many rather technical term(s), which often raise further questions about their precise meaning(s). So, in reality, and to penetrate the essence of catkin, you’d probably need to refer to other explanations/definitions – which are hopefully also in KPG. Thus, your true path through the catkin definition will more likely meander as follows:
“a slender [= ’long and thin’, p. 109], often pendulous [= ’hanging’, p. 84, which is used synonymously with ’pendant’ (illustrated on p. 84), and ’pendent’ (also on p. 84), although pendant and pendulous are more usual...], cylindrical [= ’like a cylinder...’, p. 36 - and illustrated thereon] racemose [= ’in the form of a raceme...’, p. 97; raceme = ’a monopodial inflorescence...’, p. 97 (and illustrated); monopodial = ’branching system with the main axis...’, p. 73 (and illustrated); inflorescence, defined on p. 62...] or spicate [= ’spike-like..’, p. 110 - ’spike’ defined and illustrated on p. 110] inflorescence [= ’the part of the plant that bears the flowers...’, p. 62; flower = ’an axis bearing one or more pistils...’, p. 49; pistil = 3 definitions: 1, for apocarpous (defined and illustrated on p. 13) flowers; 2, for syncarpous (defined on p. 118; ’syncarp’ defined and illustrated on p. 118) flowers; 3, ’the female organ of a flower, consisting when complete of ovary, style and stigma (Jackson, 1928)’, p. 89 - and also illustrated thereon; ovary defined and illustrated on p. 80; style defined and illustrated on p. 115; stigma defined and illustrated (in truth, the same image as used for ovary and style, but different parts arrowed in each case) on p. 113; Jackson, 1928 = the 4th edition of that author’s own Glossary of Botanic Terms - which is cited in Beentje’s Bibliography] with crowded [= ’close together’, p. 34] (sub)sessile [subsessile defined and illustrated on p. 115; sessile defined and illustrated on p. 107] unisexual [= ’having only male parts or female parts’, p. 126] apetalous [= ’without petals’, p. 12; petal = ’a single, usually free (= ’not attached to other parts, neither adhering nor united’, p. 50), unit of a completely (a potential problem here; whilst completely is not listed, complete is, and is defined as ’with all parts belonging to it, as expected’, p. 31) divided (= ’of a structure that is not entire, but split into two or more subunits...’, p. 41; entire = ’not divided (! - Ed.), smooth, unbroken by serrations, teeth or other irregularities (of margins)’, p. 44 (and illustrated thereon); smooth defined on p. 109; serrations not listed, but serrate is defined and illustrated on p. 107; margin defined and illustrated on p. 70) corolla (= ’the second whorl of floral organs, inside or above the calyx...’, p. 33 (and illustrated); whorl = ’a set of similar organs arranged in a circle around a central axis’, p. 130 (and illustrated) = a verticil (itself defined and illustrated on p. 128); floral defined on p. 49; organ = ’any definite part of a plant structure (e.g. a cell (!! - Ed.), a leaf)’, p. 79; calyx = ’the outermost whorl of floral organs, often divided into sepals’, p. 24 (and illustrated); sepal = ’a single part of the outermost whorl of floral organs...’, p. 106 (and illustrated)] flowers [= ’an axis bearing one or more pistils...’, p. 49], falling [another potential problem here in that, whilst falling is not listed, fall is, and is defined as ’one of the outermost perianth segments which is narrow at the base but expands into a broad pendulous blade (in Iris)’, p. 47] as a whole after fruiting[fruiting is not listed, but fruit is - on p. 50, as follows, ’the seed-bearing organ, with or without adnate parts’; seed = ’the structure produced from a fertilised ovule...’; ovule = ’the immature seed in the ovary...’, p. 80 (and illustrated thereon); ovary defined and illustrated on p. 80 (and already encountered previously...); adnate = ’attached to, surface to surface;... on p. 7]; = ament(um) [which itself is defined - and illustrated - on p. 9 as ’a slender, often pendulous, cylindrical inflorescence with (sub)sessile unisexual apetalous flowers, falling as a whole after fruiting; also (preferably) called a catkin’...].
Which little exercise takes a comparatively short – 22 words (shown in red in my ’expanded’ definition above) – but perfectly manageable definition and expands it to an unwieldy >600 words (!!! – Ed.) But, although much longer, arguably the fuller ’definition’ is more useful to the uninitiated. In practice it may not be quite as tedious as described because the reader may already be familiar with some of the terms used to define catkin and so will not have to follow too many tributaries and backwaters in negotiating the river that is the definition. However, to help users navigate KPG, it might help to embolden terms used within the descriptions that are themselves defined elsewhere in the glossary. Currently, this is only done for alternative words for the term being defined, as for ament(um) in the catkin definition (but – bizarrely – which is not reciprocated for catkin in the ament(um) definition…). Interestingly, although Beentje is happy to indicate preferred terms, he baulks at the idea of proposing ’recommended terms’ (p. vi), a semantic nicety if ever there was. [As an aside: Although catkin may be the preferred term, amentum may make more sense - not least to old-school botanists brought up with such terms - because it relates toAmentiferae, the name which was previously applied to a group of catkin-bearing plants.]
Those failings – and they are obstacles that bedevil most – if not all – such technical ’dictionaries’ – are not Beentje’s faults alone, but merely indicative of the problems inherent in trying to describe technical terms in words. Painting – and ’painting’ is the operative word here – accurate, unambiguous word pictures is extremely difficult – as any lexicographerwill attest. But Beentje does the job well, and doubtless the illustrations – even though they be mere line drawings – do help! [Readers will no doubt be relieved to know that catkin (and ament(um)) are both illustrated in KPG.]
In terms of ’competitors’, Beentje’s 4100 terms are dwarfed by the – but still comparatively modest – >7,600 in the forthcoming 3rd edition of Michael Allaby’s A Dictionary of Plant Sciences. But both books aim to do different things: Allaby’s seeks to cover “all aspects of plant sciences, including biochemistry, plant physiology, cytology, ecology, genetics, evolution, biogeography, earth history, and earth sciences”, whilst Beentje’s is much more tightly circumscribed. And Allaby’s has only 47 line drawings to aid “clarity and accessibility of the text”. However, more meaningful comparisons are with Harris and Harris’ Plant Identification Terminology: An Illustrated Glossary (2nd ed’n, 2001), and with Hickey and King’s The Cambridge Illustrated Glossary of Botanical Terms (2000; 2400 terms, number of illustrations not disclosed by publisher). Whilst I know a little of Harris and Harris (with its c. 2000 illustrations, section on ’grouped terms’ and useful keys to such features as common leaf surfaces, common fruit types, and common inflorescence types), I’m not familiar with Hickey and King’s tome. So, in the spirit of ’let the people decide’ I note that 33 out of the 36 reviews for Harris and Harris were 4- and 5-star rated on Amazon’s USA site (the book was not rated on the UK site when I checked), whilst all 5 reviews for Hickey and King’s book were 4- or 5-star rated on Amazon’s UK site (and its single review on the USA site was 5-star rated – which may also indicate that American Amazon users are more cosmopolitan in their botanical reading matter than UK users?). Interestingly – and with far fewer years than those two competitors to build up a following – both reviews for Beentje’s book on the UK Amazon site were 5-star rated (it is not yet rated on the USA site) [all reviews’ data as at 31 December 2011 - 14.25 GMT]. My own mild reservations notwithstanding, KPJ is highly regarded by others, in addition to its two fans on Amazon. For example, it was the Garden Media Guild Reference Book of the Year 2010 (which awards are apparently regarded as the ‘Oscars’ of the garden media world), and was described as “catnip for the garden geek” by Dominique Browning in the New York Times’ Sunday Book Review, which is a good thing (I think).
In conclusion, I like the Kew Plant Glossary (though – depending upon your level of prior knowledge – you may have to do a little extra work to glean the full meaning from some definitions). I certainly found it useful (and not just for the almost guilty pleasure of exploring the rich lexicon within which somehow persuades us that we are thereby connected with our more erudite botanical forebears – the more important now that Latin is virtually dead as the language of botanical taxonomic discovery), and wish it well. [For a peek inside KPG, take a look below.
ppcont_016386
Source:
http://aobblog.com/
Although entitled ‘plant glossary’, it is not a fully comprehensive and exhaustive listing of all terms from the complete range of botanical knowledge. Rather, KPG culls its terms from those used by botanists to “describe plants in textbooks, scientific papers, floras and field guides” [back cover]. Nevertheless, it contains 4100 such terms [no, I haven’t counted them - here I have relied on the book’s own declaration] ranging from ‘a-’ to ‘zygomorphous’, and >730 of them (from ‘abaxial’ to ‘zygomorphy’) are illustrated. (no, I didn’t count them either – Christmas holidays can be a little tiresome, but not so boring that I resort to counting pictures…or dictionary terms…). All letters of the English alphabet are represented, except Y [for completeness KPG could have listed ‘yarda’ - a peaty bog -http://www.succulent-plant.com/glossary/plantglossaryy.html]. KPG also includes 18 plates illustrating ’grouped terms’, which are themselves defined – and often illustrated – elsewhere in the book. Although this may seem like ’double-counting’ or redundant repetition, grouping such terms together is useful for comparing such features as venation of leaves, inflorescence types, and surface indumenta. KPG is not exclusively restricted to seed plants – it has a separate plate for specialised fern terms (though does strangely consider ’sporophyte’ to be a term that only applies to pteridophytes – p. 111). And – lest there be any lingering doubt – the terms covered are those used in English plant descriptions (but which are themselves borrowed from numerous sources – not just Latin: Although you could be forgiven for thinking they were judging by the long list of Latin abbreviations on pp. 3-4!). KPG helpfully indicates preferred terms (where what pass for synonyms in the English language exist) and those which are of uncommon usage (but which may still be encountered…hence their inclusion). Although laudable, that latter strategy may ultimately be self-defeating since the mere act of repeating those defunct terms only serves to acknowledge their existence and prolong their life.
Sub-titled an illustrated dictionary of plant terms, KPG is certainly illustrated. But, and disappointingly, the beautiful full colour images on the front and back covers are neither reproduced within nor matched by the other illustrations inside the book, which are black line drawings on a green (’pale citrine’ – p. 159 – to my eyes) background. Proof again – if such were still needed – of the old adage that you shouldn’t judge a book by its cover. But it would have been nice to have a few illustrations in colour, and ideally photographs, showing real structures as they appear in life. Nevertheless, the included llustrations do their job – and probably in the way that only drawings can in, i.e. not only illustrating, but also exaggerating, the relevant feature(s). Still, KPG is not entirely monochrome because it contains a colour chart on pp. 159-160. This is an extremely useful inclusion because colour words are used in some of the glossary’s terms, and can be checked against the colour chart to aid comprehension.
Accepting that there are limits to the words that are included, how well does KPG work for those that are there? Take for example the entry for ’catkin’ on p. 25, which is described as “a slender, often pendulous, cylindrical racemose or spicate inflorescence with crowded (sub)sessile unisexual apetalous flowers, falling as a whole after fruiting; = ament(um)”.
Taken at face value, that definition may be difficult to understand – particularly if you are new to the world of the botancial glossary and/or English is not your first language – because it contains many rather technical term(s), which often raise further questions about their precise meaning(s). So, in reality, and to penetrate the essence of catkin, you’d probably need to refer to other explanations/definitions – which are hopefully also in KPG. Thus, your true path through the catkin definition will more likely meander as follows:
“a slender [= ’long and thin’, p. 109], often pendulous [= ’hanging’, p. 84, which is used synonymously with ’pendant’ (illustrated on p. 84), and ’pendent’ (also on p. 84), although pendant and pendulous are more usual...], cylindrical [= ’like a cylinder...’, p. 36 - and illustrated thereon] racemose [= ’in the form of a raceme...’, p. 97; raceme = ’a monopodial inflorescence...’, p. 97 (and illustrated); monopodial = ’branching system with the main axis...’, p. 73 (and illustrated); inflorescence, defined on p. 62...] or spicate [= ’spike-like..’, p. 110 - ’spike’ defined and illustrated on p. 110] inflorescence [= ’the part of the plant that bears the flowers...’, p. 62; flower = ’an axis bearing one or more pistils...’, p. 49; pistil = 3 definitions: 1, for apocarpous (defined and illustrated on p. 13) flowers; 2, for syncarpous (defined on p. 118; ’syncarp’ defined and illustrated on p. 118) flowers; 3, ’the female organ of a flower, consisting when complete of ovary, style and stigma (Jackson, 1928)’, p. 89 - and also illustrated thereon; ovary defined and illustrated on p. 80; style defined and illustrated on p. 115; stigma defined and illustrated (in truth, the same image as used for ovary and style, but different parts arrowed in each case) on p. 113; Jackson, 1928 = the 4th edition of that author’s own Glossary of Botanic Terms - which is cited in Beentje’s Bibliography] with crowded [= ’close together’, p. 34] (sub)sessile [subsessile defined and illustrated on p. 115; sessile defined and illustrated on p. 107] unisexual [= ’having only male parts or female parts’, p. 126] apetalous [= ’without petals’, p. 12; petal = ’a single, usually free (= ’not attached to other parts, neither adhering nor united’, p. 50), unit of a completely (a potential problem here; whilst completely is not listed, complete is, and is defined as ’with all parts belonging to it, as expected’, p. 31) divided (= ’of a structure that is not entire, but split into two or more subunits...’, p. 41; entire = ’not divided (! - Ed.), smooth, unbroken by serrations, teeth or other irregularities (of margins)’, p. 44 (and illustrated thereon); smooth defined on p. 109; serrations not listed, but serrate is defined and illustrated on p. 107; margin defined and illustrated on p. 70) corolla (= ’the second whorl of floral organs, inside or above the calyx...’, p. 33 (and illustrated); whorl = ’a set of similar organs arranged in a circle around a central axis’, p. 130 (and illustrated) = a verticil (itself defined and illustrated on p. 128); floral defined on p. 49; organ = ’any definite part of a plant structure (e.g. a cell (!! - Ed.), a leaf)’, p. 79; calyx = ’the outermost whorl of floral organs, often divided into sepals’, p. 24 (and illustrated); sepal = ’a single part of the outermost whorl of floral organs...’, p. 106 (and illustrated)] flowers [= ’an axis bearing one or more pistils...’, p. 49], falling [another potential problem here in that, whilst falling is not listed, fall is, and is defined as ’one of the outermost perianth segments which is narrow at the base but expands into a broad pendulous blade (in Iris)’, p. 47] as a whole after fruiting[fruiting is not listed, but fruit is - on p. 50, as follows, ’the seed-bearing organ, with or without adnate parts’; seed = ’the structure produced from a fertilised ovule...’; ovule = ’the immature seed in the ovary...’, p. 80 (and illustrated thereon); ovary defined and illustrated on p. 80 (and already encountered previously...); adnate = ’attached to, surface to surface;... on p. 7]; = ament(um) [which itself is defined - and illustrated - on p. 9 as ’a slender, often pendulous, cylindrical inflorescence with (sub)sessile unisexual apetalous flowers, falling as a whole after fruiting; also (preferably) called a catkin’...].
Which little exercise takes a comparatively short – 22 words (shown in red in my ’expanded’ definition above) – but perfectly manageable definition and expands it to an unwieldy >600 words (!!! – Ed.) But, although much longer, arguably the fuller ’definition’ is more useful to the uninitiated. In practice it may not be quite as tedious as described because the reader may already be familiar with some of the terms used to define catkin and so will not have to follow too many tributaries and backwaters in negotiating the river that is the definition. However, to help users navigate KPG, it might help to embolden terms used within the descriptions that are themselves defined elsewhere in the glossary. Currently, this is only done for alternative words for the term being defined, as for ament(um) in the catkin definition (but – bizarrely – which is not reciprocated for catkin in the ament(um) definition…). Interestingly, although Beentje is happy to indicate preferred terms, he baulks at the idea of proposing ’recommended terms’ (p. vi), a semantic nicety if ever there was. [As an aside: Although catkin may be the preferred term, amentum may make more sense - not least to old-school botanists brought up with such terms - because it relates toAmentiferae, the name which was previously applied to a group of catkin-bearing plants.]
Those failings – and they are obstacles that bedevil most – if not all – such technical ’dictionaries’ – are not Beentje’s faults alone, but merely indicative of the problems inherent in trying to describe technical terms in words. Painting – and ’painting’ is the operative word here – accurate, unambiguous word pictures is extremely difficult – as any lexicographerwill attest. But Beentje does the job well, and doubtless the illustrations – even though they be mere line drawings – do help! [Readers will no doubt be relieved to know that catkin (and ament(um)) are both illustrated in KPG.]
In terms of ’competitors’, Beentje’s 4100 terms are dwarfed by the – but still comparatively modest – >7,600 in the forthcoming 3rd edition of Michael Allaby’s A Dictionary of Plant Sciences. But both books aim to do different things: Allaby’s seeks to cover “all aspects of plant sciences, including biochemistry, plant physiology, cytology, ecology, genetics, evolution, biogeography, earth history, and earth sciences”, whilst Beentje’s is much more tightly circumscribed. And Allaby’s has only 47 line drawings to aid “clarity and accessibility of the text”. However, more meaningful comparisons are with Harris and Harris’ Plant Identification Terminology: An Illustrated Glossary (2nd ed’n, 2001), and with Hickey and King’s The Cambridge Illustrated Glossary of Botanical Terms (2000; 2400 terms, number of illustrations not disclosed by publisher). Whilst I know a little of Harris and Harris (with its c. 2000 illustrations, section on ’grouped terms’ and useful keys to such features as common leaf surfaces, common fruit types, and common inflorescence types), I’m not familiar with Hickey and King’s tome. So, in the spirit of ’let the people decide’ I note that 33 out of the 36 reviews for Harris and Harris were 4- and 5-star rated on Amazon’s USA site (the book was not rated on the UK site when I checked), whilst all 5 reviews for Hickey and King’s book were 4- or 5-star rated on Amazon’s UK site (and its single review on the USA site was 5-star rated – which may also indicate that American Amazon users are more cosmopolitan in their botanical reading matter than UK users?). Interestingly – and with far fewer years than those two competitors to build up a following – both reviews for Beentje’s book on the UK Amazon site were 5-star rated (it is not yet rated on the USA site) [all reviews’ data as at 31 December 2011 - 14.25 GMT]. My own mild reservations notwithstanding, KPJ is highly regarded by others, in addition to its two fans on Amazon. For example, it was the Garden Media Guild Reference Book of the Year 2010 (which awards are apparently regarded as the ‘Oscars’ of the garden media world), and was described as “catnip for the garden geek” by Dominique Browning in the New York Times’ Sunday Book Review, which is a good thing (I think).
In conclusion, I like the Kew Plant Glossary (though – depending upon your level of prior knowledge – you may have to do a little extra work to glean the full meaning from some definitions). I certainly found it useful (and not just for the almost guilty pleasure of exploring the rich lexicon within which somehow persuades us that we are thereby connected with our more erudite botanical forebears – the more important now that Latin is virtually dead as the language of botanical taxonomic discovery), and wish it well. [For a peek inside KPG, take a look below.
ppcont_016386
Source:
http://aobblog.com/
34 comments:
ghsnw [url=http://www.drdrebeatscheapsales.com]beats by dre outlet[/url] afwbfe http://www.drdrebeatscheapsales.com brdl [url=http://www.drebeatsstudioheadphones.com]cheap beats[/url] wfwszg http://www.drebeatsstudioheadphones.com qoxt [url=http://www.beatsdreheadphonesonsale.com]beats headphone[/url] ggkspz http://www.beatsdreheadphonesonsale.com ufgqg [url=http://www.dreheadphonesonsales.com]beats by dre headphones[/url] skcbyt http://www.dreheadphonesonsales.com ynpag [url=http://www.drdrebeatssales.com]beats by dre sale[/url] wqcxu http://www.drdrebeatssales.com osbmc [url=http://www.beatsheadphonesbydrdre.com]beats headphone[/url] hujbe [url=http://www.focsa.org.au/myreview/beatsbydre.phtml]monster beats[/url] cvrag http://www.focsa.org.au/myreview/beatsbydre.phtml zql
olmrokz http://www.saclongchampsolde.eu gcjhcng [url=http://www.saclongchampsolde.eu]sac longchamp[/url]crxseta
gyetqlq bndgnnc http://www.gafasdesolraybanbaratas.com jsjquku [url=http://www.gafasdesolraybanbaratas.com]gafas ray ban baratas[/url]oasgsjw
hlodosn http://www.lunettesdesoleilraybans.com fxoaotv[url=http://www.lunettesdesoleilraybans.com]lunettes ray ban[/url]zjjhyde
uewnsfo http://www.guccioutletshops.com aspqqku [url=http://www.guccioutletshops.com]Cheap Gucci Wallets[/url]saxjqeu
bvkqkgm http://www.sachermessolde.com fncqaor[url=http://www.sachermessolde.com]Sacs Herm??s[/url] vxrssux
ycjesax http://www.stylomontblancsoldes.net qhrnvor[url=http://www.stylomontblancsoldes.net/]Stylo Mont Blanc Pas Cher[/url]ztancfk
vtkuebz http://www.replicahermesbagsonline.net ggksqhd[url=http://www.replicahermesbagsonline.net/]Hermes Birkin Replica[/url]okrgrxq
ybifizv http://www.mulberryoutletsonline.net lyjaiww[url=http://www.mulberryoutletsonline.net/]Mulberry Bags[/url]mkwfvel
qdubctd http://www.louisvuittonoutletonlineshops.com ywgrahy[url=http://www.louisvuittonoutletonlineshops.com/]Louis Vuitton Outlet[/url]
jhigjet http://www.sacguccisolde.com aindyqp[url=http://www.sacguccisolde.com/]Gucci Pas Cher[/url]hibftfm
rvzypve http://www.saclouisvuittonsolde.com vbrtkmh[url=http://www.saclouisvuittonsolde.com/]Sacs Louis Vuitton[/url]cpcignk
ogfhbno http://www.raybansforsales.com kbrzfkf [url=http://www.raybansforsales.com]Ray Ban Aviator 3025[/url]bcnggig
ofxyvvg http://www.montblancpensonlinesale.com jepozzy[url=http://www.montblancpensonlinesale.com]mont blanc fountain pens[/url]fdvqtlg
http://acquistarecialisgenerico40mg.net/ cialis vendita
http://comprarcialisgenerico40mg.com/ cialis
http://cialis-achat.net/ acheter cialis
http://kaufencialisgenerika20mg.net/ bestellen cialis
Then, if you have a diet preventing to begin another, it is very difficult to see results or in order to avoid the crooks to occur. Finally, liquid protein diets could potentially cause menstrual cessation in ladies due to rapid weight-loss buy phen375 cheap as with some other project, if you possibly could't measure it, it is possible to't manage it. Various filtration systems exist that a countertop purification may employ. Although most doctors recommend you drink 6-8 associated with water per day, that amount actually differs from one individual to another http://www.phen375factsheet.com this helps that you slim down by growing the rate at that you burn calories. Defining Prosperity - If you need to try meditating for prosperity, you could possibly wish to begin by defining prosperity yourself [url=http://www.phen375factsheet.com]phen375[/url] the maddening facet of these types of relationships is the narcissist usually seems to casual friends or acquaintances because the ideal citizen.
http://www.buchmatrix.de/content/myself-jans-damian-disastrous-skiils-slughorn-empower-network Hyclebeekclenue [url=http://www.cordobanutricion.com/content/winthrop-grossly-suhani-starfleet-earring-certify-empower-network-buggies-standardized]online money making[/url] emaibre earn money online like us
http://kaufencialisgenerika40mg.net/ cialis kaufen
http://achat-cialis-pascher.net/ cialis commander
http://acquistare-cialis-senzaricetta.net/ cialis farmaco per impotenza
http://comprargenericocialisespana.net/ cialis
cialis generic generic cialis cialis commander cialis cialis cialis roma cialis generico cialis
generic cialis online generic cialis online cialis achat cialis generique generico cialis acquisto cialis cialis cialis necesita receta
Woah! I'm really digging the template/theme of this blog. It's simple, yet effective.
A lot of times it's very hard to get that "perfect balance" between usability and visual appearance. I must say you'νe done
a great job with this. Alѕo, the blog loadѕ extremely fast for
me οn Opera. Superb Βlog!
Feel free to vіsit my weblog - download jvzoo
Hey! Ѕomeοne in my Facebook group sharеd this wеbsitе with us so I came to
give it a loοk. I'm definitely enjoying the information. I'm
bοoκmarκіng anԁ ωill be tweeting thіs to mу folloωerѕ!
Outѕtandіng blog and superb style and desіgn.
Stop by my wеb site: how to get your spouse back
my web site > Ex Girlfriend Pics
hеllo theгe аnd thanκ you for your information
– І havе certainly pickеԁ up something neω frоm right hегe.
I did hοweveг eхpertisе severаl technical issues usіng thіs websіte,
as Ι еxperіencеd to reload the site a lot of times previous to I could gеt
it to load properly. I haԁ bеen ωonԁering if your hοsting is ΟK?
Not that I'm complaining, but slow loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and could damage your high quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I'm аddіng this
RSS to mу email anԁ can look out for a lot moгe of your respective fascіnating content.
Make suгe yоu upԁatе this
agаin soon.
Ѕtоp by my wеbpage: love affair
My web site: long distance relationship break up
Why peoрle still use to гead newѕ ρapeгs ωhеn in
this technologіcal globе all is aсcessіble
on net?
My ωеblog ... vitamin for Acne
I quite liκe reaԁіng thгough а post that can make ρeоplе think.
Also, thank you for аllowing me to cοmmеnt!
Feel freе to visit my homepage; http://www.paleodietprimal.Info
Ӏ'm not sure where you are getting your info, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for wonderful info I was looking for this information for my mission.
Feel free to surf to my blog post ... get cash for Surveys
Also see my webpage > get cash for surveys review scam
Hi thеre, just ωanted to mention, I
liked this article. It was helρful. Κeep οn
poѕtіng!
My homepage: Wso free
I’m nοt that much of а intегnet reaԁer to be honeѕt but
уour blοgs really nice, keеp іt up!
I'll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back down the road. All the best
Take a look at my site: dating advice for guys in college
my page > teenage dating advice for guys
Hi my family member! I wish to say that thіs aгticlе
is amazing, great written and come ωith appгoximately all vital infos.
I ωould likе tο seе extra poѕts like
this .
My homepаge :: diet recipes
Үοu reallу makе it ѕeеm so еasy ωith
your рresentatiοn but I fіnd this topic to be actually sοmething that I
think I ωould nеver undегѕtanԁ.
It seems too сomрlех аnd еxtremelу broad for me.
I am looking forωarԁ fоr your nеxt ρost, I'll try to get the hang of it!
my web page: christian dating advice for guys
Excellent blog herе! Alѕo your sіte lоadѕ up fаѕt!
What host aгe уou uѕіng? Can I get уouг affіlіate linκ tо
yоur host? I wish my wеbsite loaԁeԁ up
as fast as yourѕ lol
my wеb site :: Get Jvzoo
http://acheterviagragnerique1.net/ acheter viagra
http://comprarviagragenerico1.net/ viagra generico
http://acquistareviagragenerico1.net/ viagra
http://kaufenvaigragenerika1.net/ viagra preise
http://acheterviagragnerique1.net/ viagra prix
http://comprarviagragenerico1.net/ comprar viagra
http://acquistareviagragenerico1.net/ viagra acquistare
http://kaufenvaigragenerika1.net/ viagra
http://buycheapcialisonline1.net/ cheap cialis online
http://prixcialisgenerique1.net/ acheter cialis
http://acquistocialisgenerico10mg.net/ costo cialis
http://comprarcialisgenericoes10mg.net/ precio cialis
http://buycheapcialisonline1.net/ cheap cialis online
http://prixcialisgenerique1.net/ acheter cialis
http://acquistocialisgenerico10mg.net/ cialis comprare
http://comprarcialisgenericoes10mg.net/ cialis
vente viagra viagra sans ordonnance prix viagra viagra achat en ligne viagra generico viagra 25 mg precio acquistare viagra viagra roma
Great pοѕt. I waѕ checking constantly this blog anԁ I'm impressed! Very helpful information specifically the last part :) I care for such info a lot. I was looking for this particular info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.
Look at my web blog - mylittlecreeper.dk
Due to different styles and colors of UGG boots and UGG shoes, you are able to match your mood plus your clothes.
The artist material moisture from your feet, ensure that
is stays cold and dry. Delicately wipe it employing
a damp material, is not going to brush it fiercely
that features a brush, don't melt away these comfortable shoes with boiled water, and don't use washing detergent and alkaline cleaning fluid to scrub it in the same time.
my blog - プラダ バッグ
Cheap Burberry Handbags These furnishings are a good choice.
If you've no idea about whether boots you want are real or otherwise not, it really is advisable not to get them. The unique qualities with the sheepskin mean that they can will maintain feet warm in perhaps the coldest of weather, but if you use them in summer they is not going to overheat your foot.
Also visit my homepage; プラダ
UGG Australia has produced some unique and fun types in boots for girls - Classic Stripe UGG Boots
actually are a perfect illustration on this. Buy cheap UGG boots visit: When it
comes to purchasing these boots, world-wide-web retailers offer these with lower
prices than these from local sellers. As an end result of peculiarity about the physical appearance of these boots, a lot of people won't want to utilize them beforehand of.
Feel free to surf to my page louis vuitton
vente cialis acheter cialis generique
prix cialis achat cialis en france
cialis senza ricetta costo cialis
cialis precio comprar cialis online
cialis achat cialis prix
cialis generique cialis
costo cialis tadalafil comprare
comprar cialis comprar cialis por internet
Just because the name implies, these ugg boots are from Australia, which are
crafted from twin-tier merino wool. 5L models with the "Iridescence" allowance box,
in spite of well-designed counterfeit bright Jiuzun base, so that the cut apparent just appropriate bright reflects "Iridescence" the
cradle of every neon, to the account of Hennessy cheap uggs Salon goes towards
the a lots of admirable style. And reproductions could possibly
appearance in the same way terrific.
My weblog; ルイヴィトン 財布 激安
Cheap Burberry Handbags These furnishings certainly are a good choice.
If you have no idea about whether boots you want are real or otherwise, it can
be advisable not to purchase them. And reproductions may well appearance in the same way terrific.
Visit my blog post; プラダ 人気
Many customers have stated that once they have ordered these counterfeit, fake, imitation UGG's, they would arrive in the plain, brown box that looked battered. And recollection, they will often eventually be willful Worn tedium without situation, so that this graduate can do their job. And utilization in the preserving stratum inside the knock-off is oftentimes a easy preventative pelage - not the true authenticated guy who is able to conflict users; the production is her toes when her vernacular users of sea boots check inside the U.
My site prada
There are various online auction sites that you can check out
every so often if you wanted to get the best prices on
your ugg boots. And recollection, they may eventually be willful Worn tedium without situation, so the graduate are able to do their job.
Nevertheless, with super delicate ease and convenience,
increased desire, and winter season season approaching, you
are able to still discover some great provides.
my blog - プラダ バッグ
Post a Comment